Are you curious about Rife? You'll like this
article on Royal Raymond Rife with so many quotes of Rife himself...
Learn The Secrets of Rife and Dispell All The
Myths about Rife's Technology: Inspirational Article Explores
Royal Rife's Work in His Own Words. What Are The Present Day Implications
For Our Future?
New Rife Article - Just updated May 2004
This article should set some things straight.
How did Dr. Rife's instruments work?
Since the first writing of this article more information
has come to light (John Marsh’s papers & tapes)
that made it so we had to correct the major errors that were
in it. We believe that this new documented information will
finally answer these questions: who found the audio frequencies
and what instruments used them? And what frequencies were
Dr. Rife’s true M.O.R.s? When new information is received
that sheds greater light on Dr. Rife and the history of those
who worked with him then it becomes necessary to update this
article.
In this article we will examine the way Dr. Rife’s
instruments worked. We will look at the evidence by quoting
the sources such as Dr. Rife, John Crane, John Marsh, Dr.
Couche, Dr. Lara, Dr. Stafford and Bertrand L. Comperet,
Rife’s attorney in the 1938 Beam Ray Corporation trial,
and later John Crane’s attorney for Life Labs’
trial in 1961. Hopefully anyone who reads this article will
have a better understanding about Dr. Rife and the methods
he used. Our goal is to try to give people information so
that they can make a more informed decision. We have tried
to explain in laymen’s terms so that anyone can understand.
We hope this will be helpful.
What is a ray tube and how does it work?
Dr. Rife used a ray tube with his instruments. A ray tube
was made out of glass, quartz or Pyrex and was filled with
a noble gas or a mixture of noble gases. Dr. Rife used different
mixtures of gases but finally ended up using helium. He
stated:
Rife: “We have experimented with various inert gases
and we found that helium stood up by the bombardment better
than any of the other gases. That’s why we use it.
We don’t care about the color or anything of that
sort. It stood up better over many more hours of bombardment
than the argon and the crypton and those different gases
that we tried.” (John Marsh collection - Gonin and
Siner papers pages 25 & 26. www.rife.org)
The ray tube was connected to the instrument by two wires.
These wires were connected to two round metal bars that
went into the glass tube and had round disks connected to
their ends. One disk was straight and the other one was
on a 45 degree angle. This gave it a directional effect
towards the patient. Dr. Rife stated that the ray tube was
“a directional antenna”. Because the scientific
technology behind ray tubes had already been perfected,
Rife worked with that technology and only had to make some
adjustments for it to work the way he wanted it to. Bertrand
L. Comperet, Rife’s attorney, stated in an interview:
Comperet: “Now, the original instrument had a tube,
like an X-ray tube. That was the way in which Rife developed
it. You see, all the X-ray work necessarily was done with
a beam projected from a tube. So, Rife worked on the same
basis.” (Comperet interview papers - 1970’s)
There are limitations to ray tubes that need to be understood.
It has to do with the laws of physics. Ray tubes when properly
tuned are very efficient. About 95% of the energy that you
put into a ray tube comes out. Dr. Rife’s instruments
put out about 50 to 60 watts to the ray tube. This means
about 50 watts came out of the ray tube. You have to divide
the 50 watts that come out of the ray tube by four (because
of the laws of physics on signal loss) for every foot that
you move away from the ray tube. So at one foot away from
the ray tube you only have 12.5 watts. At two feet you only
have 3.125 watts and at 3 feet you only have about .78 of
a watt. This is important to understand because Rife and
the doctors that used his equipment put the ray tube within
a few inches of the patient’s body. Dr. Couche said
that he would sometimes touch the body of the patient in
the area that needed to be treated. Dr. Robert P. Stafford
said when we asked him, that when he treated cancer patients
he would put the ray tube within a few inches of the body
and treat a 6 inch square area. He would move the ray tube
up and down and back and forth so that the whole 6 inch
area was treated. He said that he did this because of the
way the phanotron ray tube worked. The design of a phanotron
ray tube makes it partially directional and concentrates
its energy or power into a small area. With the power loss
from the ray tube it is easy to understand why Dr. Stafford,
Dr. Couch, Dr. Rife and the other doctors used the ray tube
right next to the body.
We have built an AZ-58 ray tube instrument (a 1950’s
Rife instrument made by Life Labs) from schematics that
are on Stan Truman’s site, www.rife.org, under
AZ-58 research information. This instrument is almost the
same as the original 1930’s Beam Ray instrument built
by Philip Hoyland found on Aubrey Scoon's website (http://www.scoon.co.uk/Electrotherapy/Rife/BeamRay/index.htm),
except it doesn’t have any harmonics in the carrier
frequency and it uses square wave audio frequencies. We
tested the AZ-58 for penetration and found that at about
32 inches from the body full penetration of the frequency
emitted from the ray tube was lost. From the tests made,
it takes at least 1.25 watts to penetrate all the way through
the body.
We are not trying to upset or offend any manufacturers of
ray tube instruments but the laws of physics must be understood
no matter how much we may dislike it. With this said, many
ray tube instruments built today recommend that you stay
from 3 to 6 feet away from the ray tube. These instruments
put out about 125 to 250 watts into the ray tube. With 125
watts you only get 31.25 watts to the body at one foot.
If one sits 3 to 6 feet away from the ray tube then, according
to the laws of physics, there may not be enough power to
fully penetrate the body. Since Dr. Rife always tested his
instruments for penetration, and used the ray tube right
next to the body, I believe he understood these limitations.
Some use a long cylinder type ray tube that stands straight
up or lays down sideways. These put out in 360 degrees with
no directional effect and are called omni-directional. This
means that the 125 watts that come out of the ray tube are
spread out in 360 degrees. With the energy spread out in
360 degrees at a distance of 3 to 6 feet away, one can see
that by the laws of physics the power penetrating the body
is minimal. We are not questioning the effectiveness of
ray tubes, just the distance in relation to the power loss.
We are not doubting that there may be physiologic effects
from ray tubes at a great distance (50 to 100 feet) but
the real question is can the frequency fully penetrate the
body and kill an organism at that distance?
What power levels did Dr. Rife use?
Dr. Rife’s #4 instrument and the instrument built
by Beam Ray Corporation of the 1930’s and Life Labs
of the 1950’s put about 50 to 60 watts into the ray
tube. Because some of Dr. Rife’s information about
instrument power levels is confusing, most of us have thought
that Dr. Rife’s instruments put out 400 to 600 watts
to the ray tube but new information show this is not correct.
The problem has been that the people who wrote down this
information were incorrectly giving the power usage of Rife’s
instruments as the output power. Dr. Rife’s instruments
used 400 to 600 watts but they only put out about 50 to
60 watts to the ray tube. When the 1930’s Beam Ray
Corporation instrument power levels were measured, it showed
that they used about 450 watts and output about 50 watts
to the ray tube. When measured, the AZ-58 1950’s instrument
used about the same 450 watts but output about 60 watts
to the ray tube. In the paper “Development of the
Rife Ray and use in devitalizing of pathogenic micro-organisms”
it states: “The frequencies were generated by a tube
oscillator with many stages of amplification, the final
stage being a 50 watt output tube.” Now this output
tube should not be confused with the ray tube. These are
the old tubes used in radios and televisions. The main output
tube in the AZ-58 is an 812A tube that is rated at 85 watts.
You can get more power out of it but you will also shorten
your tube life. The 1930’s Beam Ray instruments used
a similar tube with about the same power output.
The important thing to understand is that Dr. Rife’s
instruments did not put out any more power than about 60
watts to the ray tube. When Dr. Rife, Crane and Marsh were
working on sea water conversion and used frequencies in
that process, they boosted the output power in the instrument.
Concerning that instrument and some 1930’s Beam Ray
instruments that Dr. Yale had increased the power level
on Rife said the following:
Rife: “Now this outfit here - the way we have it
boosted up here now with an extreme lot of power behind
the actual output that is coming out of the thing...I wouldn’t
want to use this - or I wouldn’t want to use this
instrument here the way it is souped up there for this salt
water proposition to treat a patient with.”
GONIN: “No.”
Rife: “You can get beyond the limit.”
GONIN: “Yes, quite.”
Crane: “That’s what Dr. Yale did. You see,
he stepped it up and up and up…”
Rife: “When Vern Thompson used to go down there and
take care of Yale’s machines - when he began stepping
them up and so...where you get up into that extreme power…oh
yes, that is not good. With the power that is in these [50
to 60 watts], there is absolutely no harm because I had
my microscope here - I had my tube [ray tube] right here
in front of it - oh, about 11 or 12 inches away from the
slide in the microscope and here I was with this thing all
around like that and that tube going here and my specimens
and the microscope year after year tuning that thing and
it never harmed me any.” (John Marsh collection -
Gonin papers pages 2 & 3. www.rife.org)
Dr. Yale’s Beam Ray instruments were putting out
a lot more power than Dr. Rife felt was safe. If Yale’s
instruments were made to put out the maximum power that
the main output tube could produce then they probably were
putting out around 100 watts. It may be that Dr. Rife was
just over cautious but we believe his statement should be
considered when one looks at power levels of 100 to 300
watts. These kind of power levels are not necessary if a
phanotron tube is used.
Is it necessary to use a ray tube to put out the frequencies?
We really shouldn’t care if an instrument uses a
ray tube or a pad so long as it will kill the microorganism
we desire. In the strictest sense of the word just because
you have a ray tube doesn’t mean it’s Rife.
By the time you read this whole article you will find out
that no one is doing exactly what Rife did. But does that
mean that these instruments don’t work? Some of those
building pad instruments are not using ray tubes or using
Rife’s original frequencies. Those that are building
ray tube instruments are also not using Rife’s original
frequencies. We have quite a paradox. This is the problem
we face. If we were to build a ray tube instrument that
worked exactly the way Dr. Rife’s did (use frequencies
from 87000 hertz to 17 megahertz) then we would be violating
FCC regulations and the instruments would be illegal. We
can build a pad instrument that will use all the frequencies
Dr. Rife used but then we can’t use a ray tube. When
we consider the legal problems we face today with building
instruments, the only instrument we can legally build that
will use all of doctor Rife’s frequencies is a pad
instrument. Therefore we should look at this method carefully
and not reject it out of personal bias. One thing about
a pad instrument is that we really don’t have to build
any because common off the shelf function generators with
the right frequency range are already available. If you
want special features that are not in common function generators
then you will have to pay for them.
We feel that no one should really care if an instrument
uses a pad or ray tube so long as it works. With this in
mind let’s look at the reasons why pad instruments
were first built. John Crane and John Marsh had really good
reasons why they built pad instruments. After nearly 50
years of use there is enough evidence that a pad instrument
works just as well as a ray tube instrument. In some cases,
because of the electrical stimulation like a tens instrument,
they may even work better than a ray tube on some conditions.
We will now take a look at some of the reasons that prompted
Crane and Marsh to use pads:
Rife: “But the principle of this thing is basically
built on a coordinative vibration. Just like one tuning
fork pitched to the C. Another one here—you strike
this one and this one vibrates.”
Dr. Lara: “What kind of vibration is it? Electromagnetic
vibration?”
Rife: “We won’t say magnetic, we will say electronic
frequency vibration. The same as put out on a broadcasting
station for the radio. The same thing you know, only it’s
transmitted into a tube. And the tube acts as a partial
directional antenna you see.” (John Marsh Rife CDs
- CD 6 track 2)
In the John Marsh papers describing his trip to Ohio we
read a statement made by Dr. Rife:
Rife: “You know we had an idea when we had our Clinic
in La Jolla, of course that was battery and motor generator
operated that set, you know, and boy it would sure raise
the devil with all the radios so we had a couple of cars
that was equipped with car radios and we sent them out and
we would take the switch of that thing, and had a code you
know like an S.O.S., and one of them went up north, and
one of them went south from La Jolla. Before we started
in we wanted to see how far we were going to disturb things
with it you know, and incidentally we had it in a steel
room, a steel lined vault about this size at the old Ellen
Scripp’s home. It was the vault in the library of
the Scripp’s home where they kept their valuable manuscripts
and books in all steel lined and a door on it like a safe.
We had the thing inside of that too, but it didn’t
make much difference, but we started in, and one car lost
the pick up on top of Torry Pines, and the other one half
ways through Mission Beach picked it up, and then they could
go a hundred feet and lose and then they would have to pick
it up again. Old Henry [Henry Siner] the boy that was with
us out there, one of the lab boys, boy he went up in the
air. He says, “By God” he says “look,
we’re going to fix them up right. At two o’clock
we’ll hook this up to a big radio station, a big transmitting
station, and at two o’clock next week we’ll
broadcast for tuberculosis, and at half past three the week
after we will broadcast for cancer, and everybody at the
radio will pick it up”. See, boy I said Henry that
really is an idea.” (John Marsh collection - Trip
to Ohio papers page 7. www.rife.org)
Dr. Rife understood that the frequencies could be broadcast
by a radio station if it had enough power. Metal antennas
are just as efficient as a ray tube. When John Crane and
John Marsh, two of Dr. Rife’s business partners in
the 1950’s, came to understand this they eliminated
the ray tube and used pads or hand cylinders to apply the
frequencies. The pads and hand cylinders work just like
an antenna except you do not use too much power so that
they are safe to use. The body also becomes an antenna when
you hold the hand cylinders or use the pads and this is
why pad instruments work. Comperet stated this in his interview:
Comperet: “Now, Crane said: 'Well now look,
Rife himself admits that no matter how much tube and ray,
and so on, you have, you can’t get any results unless
you’ve got the right frequency. Therefore the real
clue to the thing is the frequency and not the means by
which you deliver it.' ”
Comperet also said:
Comperet: “Well, Crane originally was, with more
modern techniques, duplicating the Rife machine, tube and
all for early experiments. And, as I say, he came to the
conclusion that you just weren’t getting anything
additional by the use of the tube. If you didn’t get
the frequency, you could run the rest of it indefinitely
and nothing happened. So, what Crane did, he got an audio
frequency generator. Now, you could make them up yourself
by an awful lot of work, or you could buy a Heathkit audio
frequency generator and get all the same results with a
lot less time and effort. So he was using these Heathkit
generators. Now, instead of a beam projected from a tube,
a ray, he simply had two wires. I think they were aluminum
knobs on the end of them, which would be used. They would
be put on the body in such a position that the natural flow
of the current from one to the other would go through the
diseased area, and he got astonishing results.” (Comperet
interview papers - 1970’s)
These pads or hand cylinders act just like an antenna
when in contact with the body. But only if you have an RF
carrier frequency. Without an RF carrier frequency the audio
frequencies will only go through the connective tissue and
not the cell. Without the RF carrier they still work well
and are a lot like a tens machine. We will cover these audio
frequencies and a carrier frequency later in this article.
Some have thought that it was the light from the ray tube
that made it work. But the evidence doesn’t seem to
support that either because in the Gonin papers of John
Marsh Dr. Rife said this in regards to the light that came
from the ray tube:
Rife: “We don’t care about the color or anything
of that sort.” (John Marsh collection - Gonin papers
page 25. www.rife.org)
Dr. Couche, when he visited Rife’s lab with some
other men, said:
Dr. Couche: “There was fifteen inches of concrete
on the floor so as to stop any earthquake shocks from interfering
with his work. And in his laboratory upon the ground floor
he had a microscope with a slide on it that this group of
people and myself looked at. And this was not stained, there
was no killing of the bacteria on it. It was just a fresh
culture of the colon bacillus…..Well we all went down
under the stairs into the cellar right immediately under
the microscope upon the floor above us and the Rife machine
was down in underneath there under the culture in the cellar
probably I suppose about ten feet away, eight or ten feet
away. And he turned the machine on and gave it less than
a half minute’s frequency for the colon bacillus...Then
he turned the machine off and we all came upstairs and waited
for ten or fifteen minutes. And presently he came back to
his microscope and he said, “Well gentlemen come and
look at the slide now.” Well to my astonishment the
bacilli all had been killed and they were all stacked up
on the slide.” (John Marsh Rife CDs - CD 3 track 1)
There is no possible way the light from the ray tube could
have penetrated that fifteen inch concrete floor. It is
obvious that the light didn’t make any difference
but that it was the frequencies that were broadcast through
the ray tube. It is easy to see that there is more than
one way to deliver the frequencies. The ray tube could be
easily replaced with metal hand cylinders and foot pads.
Pad instruments come in contact with the body. With an RF
carrier they turn the body into an antenna and work on the
same principle as a metal antenna or ray tube. People have
been using pad instruments without an RF carrier for almost
45 years now and have had good results. But to work the
way the ray tube instruments that used low audio frequencies
did an RF carrier frequency is necessary.
History of Rife’s instruments and changes made
There is some confusion about exactly what Dr. Rife did
in the early years, from 1920 to about 1933. This is because
very little information has survived. His lab notes detailing
26 conditions and their frequencies have been preserved.
The earliest information we have shows that he used frequencies
ranging from the audio range to just over 17 MHz. He used
many different carrier frequencies at this time. People
are beginning to experiment with these frequencies and are
claiming very good results.
The operation of the Rife Ray #4 and the instruments that
used audio frequencies built in late 1936 by Philip Hoyland
and Beam Ray Corporation of the 1930’s as well as
those built in the 1950’s by Life Labs are somewhat
understood. We will be looking at these instruments and
how they worked. Much of the information we currently have
has come from a 1950’s AZ-58 built from schematics
and the only known original 1930’s Beam Ray instrument
which has been repaired. Using an oscilloscope, Philip Hoyland’s
audio frequencies are now known and their correlation to
the 1950’s instruments that also used audio frequencies.
In order to follow the evolution of Rife technology, we
will first examine the Rife Ray #4 that was built in 1935
and his earlier instrument that he used in 1934. Then we’ll
look at the 1930’s Beam Ray Corporation ray tube instrument
followed by the ray tube and pad instruments built by Life
Labs in the 1950’s.
1935 Rife Ray #4 instrument
1) Used a ray tube.
2) Had two separate oscillators that produced 2 frequencies
from 87,000 hertz to 22.5 MHz.
3) Mixed two sine wave frequencies. May have had a
carrier
frequency higher than 22.5 MHz.
4) Power usage about 450 to 600 watts. Output to
the ray
tube about 50 RF watts.
The following information comes from the Beam Ray trial
papers that are on Stan Truman's site www.rife.org and various
other documents. Anyone that wishes to can read these papers.
We will tell the story and quote from the various documents
as necessary. Philip Hoyland was hired by Dr. Milbank Johnson
and the University of Southern California Special Medical
Research Committee in 1935 to build a more up to date portable
frequency instrument that could be used for research by
doctors. Dr. Rife’s 1934 instrument was very cumbersome
and almost filled a whole room. In order to build this instrument
Hoyland needed to know what frequencies Dr. Rife was using.
So he brought to Dr. Rife’s lab what we would call
today an oscilloscope to read the frequencies. Up until
about 1933 there was no such instrument that could easily
and accurately measure frequencies. It was very difficult
to read the correct frequencies prior to this time.
Philip Hoyland had to know exactly what frequencies Dr.
Rife was using in order to build the new instrument. On
the stand in the 1939 trial he stated this about the frequencies:
(Beam Ray trial papers www.rife.org)
Hoyland: “They were taken off the last machine that
was built by Dr. Rife. I transferred them from one machine
to another.”
At another point during the trial the transcript reads:
Comperet: “In June of 1935 was when you made an agreement
with the [transcript missing words] medical research to
build a Rife Ray machine, you did build it soon after that?”
Hoyland: “Yes.”
Comperet: “You had an agreement with them that all
work was to be done under Dr. Rife’s direction?”
Hoyland: “That’s what the contract called for.”
Comperet: “Did you do this work without getting the
frequencies from Dr. Rife?”
Hoyland: “I calibrated the machine according to the
bacteria.”
Comperet: “What specifically did you do that constituted
this recalibration?”
Hoyland: “I used a standard oscillator against his
machine to see what frequencies he was using.”
Comperet: “He set his machine and you measured his
frequencies?”
Hoyland: “Yes.”
Comperet: “Did you make any memorandum of these particular
frequencies?”
Hoyland: “Yes, I gave Dr. Johnson and Dr. Rife a
list of them.”
Later during the trial Dr. Rife was asked where the frequencies
came from:
Judge Kelly: “When you constructed this Beam Ray
machine you had a dial representing the frequencies or harmonics?”
Rife: “We had many dials on the original machine.”
Judge Kelly: “Is that the machine Mr. Hoyland got
the frequencies from?”
Rife: “Yes, he took them off that old machine.”
The frequencies that Hoyland read off of Dr. Rife’s
instrument were different than the earlier lab note frequencies.
This has caused a lot of confusion. Why were the frequencies
different from his lab notes? Hoyland said that Dr. Rife
didn’t know exactly what frequencies he was using.
The problem was that back in the late 1920’s and early
1930’s it was very easy to read a harmonic frequency
rather than the correct one. It appears this is what Dr.
Rife was doing. Dr. Rife understood that he may not have
true frequencies because he stated:
Rife: “I’ve talked to you [John Crane] and
Vern [Vern Thompson] and other people too that there may
be some of the frequencies that we are using that may be
harmonics, you know. Because when I check on that thing
and look through that microscope hour after hour day after
day, tuning that damn thing to find something that will
kill that bug. And every hour or half an hour, whatever
is required, I put a new fresh culture under the microscope
and keep that on and I find something that folds it up,
alright!...It’s not an impossibility that some of
those frequencies may be a harmonic. We may not know the
true frequencies of some of them. But it does the business.
Maybe if we had the true frequency it would do it better
because it has more power than a harmonic.”
(John Marsh Rife CDs - CD 7 track 2)
Hoyland was able to accurately read the correct frequencies
with the equipment he had brought with him to the lab. It’s
not that these earlier frequencies didn’t work, THEY
DID! But the frequencies that are on Rife’s lab notes
must have been harmonics and not the fundamental frequencies.
We now know from the trial why there were different frequencies.
Hoyland then built the Rife Ray #4 and it used the correct
frequencies that he had read. Dr. Rife said that sometimes
it took months to find the frequency for just one organism.
When we think about this, it is not logical or even possible
that in the space of 5 to 6 months Dr. Rife would go and
look for new frequencies for the microorganisms when he
believed he already had them. Below are the Rife Ray #4
frequencies.
| Rife Ray #4 frequencies |
| Actinomycosis (Streptothrix) |
192,000 |
| Anthrax |
139,000 |
| B. Coli (Rod form) |
417,000 |
| B. Coli (Filterable virus) |
770,000 |
| Bacillus X (Cancer carcinoma & sarcoma) |
1,604,000 |
| Gonorrhea |
233,000 |
| Spinal Meningitis |
427,000 |
| Staphylococcus Pyogenes Aureus |
478,000 |
Staphylococcus Pyogenes Albus
This frequency found
in Rife's Papers |
549,070 |
| Streptococcus Pyogenes |
720,000 |
| Syphilis |
789,000 |
| Tetanus |
234,000 |
| Tuberculosis (Rod) |
369,000 |
| Typhoid Fever (Rod form) |
760,000 |
| Typhoid Fever (Filter passing) |
1,445,000 |
1934 Rife ray tube instrument
We will now take a look at the frequencies from Dr. Rife’s
lab notes. Each lab note had two frequencies. One was listed
in cycles per second and the second was listed in meters.
The meter frequency has been converted to cycles per second
or hertz. As we said earlier Dr. Rife had two frequencies
that were in the audio range and those are in bold in the
lab note frequencies. Even though Dr. Rife was working with
John Crane and John Marsh with the AZ-58 instruments that
used audio frequencies he still said his frequencies ranged
from the audio band to the broadcast band of frequencies.
Here is his statement of the range of his frequencies from
the John Marsh collection of Rife CDs:
Rife: “Some of them are in the visible band, or I
mean not only the visible band but, uh, band of frequencies
audible to the human ear. Some of them are way beyond either
way. They run through a very, very large gamut. Some of
them are very, very broad, long. Some of them are...not
extremely short. There are none of them what we call our
ultra short wave that I have found yet. Well there’s
many of them...we would, uh, classify in the ultrasonic
band because they’re not visible [sic] with the human
ear. They’re way beyond you know. And some of them
are even in the broadcast band. Your cancer is very high.
You can’t hear it, the oscillation. But now you take
your T.B. [Tuberculosis]. Now that’s down. A little
more you see...if you don’t have an absolute coordinative
resonance, you have nothing . One tenth of one meter off
and you have nothing. Its got to be absolutely correct for
that individual organism. Its got to be precise...the virus
of cancer has a certain frequency. And it has to be there,
otherwise if it’s a little one way or the other, no
good, no good for nothing.” (John Marsh Rife CDs -
CD 5 track 2, CD 6 track 2 and CD 7 track 1)
The Rife Ray #4 Frequencies that we have already listed
and the lab note frequencies listed in the following list
are within the range that Dr. Rife described. The question
we have to ask ourselves is if Rife’s frequencies
were all in the audio band why would he have made these
statements?
| Rife's lab note frequencies |
First Frequency In Hertz |
Second Frequency in Meters to Hertz |
| Actinomycosis (Streptothrix) |
678,000 |
186,554 |
| Anthrax |
900,000 |
272,539 |
| Anthrax Symptomatic |
400,000 |
16,655 Audio range |
B. Coli (Rod form) |
683,000 |
317,914 |
B. Coli (Filterable virus) |
8,581,000 |
11,103,424 |
| Bacillus X & Y. Cancer |
11,780,000 |
17,033,662 |
| Bubonic Plague |
160,000 |
512,466 |
| Catarrh |
1,800,000 |
1,713,100 |
| Cholera Spirillum |
851,000 |
960,873 |
| Contagious Conjunctivitis |
1,206,000 |
2,025,625 |
| Diphtheria |
800,000 |
1,090,154 |
| Glanders |
986,000 |
736,591 |
| Gonorrhea |
600,000 |
150,649 |
| Influenza |
1,674,000 |
1,946,704 |
| Leprosy |
743,000 |
251,926 |
| Pneumonia |
1,200,000 |
381,901 |
| Spinal Meningitis |
927,800 |
1,795,164 |
| Staphylococcus Pyogenes Aureus |
998,740 |
555,171 |
Staphylococcus Pyogenes Albus This frequency found in Rife’s
papers |
549,070 |
|
| Streptococcus Pyogenes |
1,214,000 |
2,111,214 |
Syphilis (Treponema Pallidum) |
900,000 |
2,775,856 |
| Tetanus |
700,000 |
15,779 Audio range |
Tuberculosis (Rod form) |
583,000 |
541,142 |
Typhoid Fever (Rod form) |
900,000 |
868,964 |
Typhoid Fever (Filter passing) |
9,680,000 |
13,943,835 |
The Rife Ray #4 frequencies are the frequencies that were
used in the 1934 Clinic. How do we know that these frequencies
were used in the 1934 clinic? Because in the trial Hoyland
and Rife said:
Hoyland: “They were taken off the last machine that
was built by Dr. Rife. I transferred them from one machine
to another.”
And Dr. Rife said this at the trial:
Rife: “We had many dials on the original machine...Yes,
he took them off that old machine.” (Beam Ray trial
papers www.rife.org)
The Rife Ray #4 machine was the instrument he built after
reading these frequencies. Anyone looking at the #4 frequencies
will notice that none of them are audio frequencies. The
lab note frequencies have only two audio frequencies and
they were not used in any of the instruments of the 1937-39
Beam Ray Corporation or the 1950’s Life Labs instruments.
1937-39 Beam Ray Corporation instrument:
1) Used a ray tube.
2) Used a single 4.6 MHz sine wave carrier frequency.
3) Modulated sine wave audio frequencies onto the 4.6 MHz
harmonic carrier frequency.
4) Power usage about 450 watts. Output to the ray tube about
50 RF watts.
The next question is since the Rife Ray #4 didn’t
use audio frequencies where did the audio frequencies used
in the Beam Ray instruments come from? In the 1939 Beam
Ray trial we are told where they came from. Philip Hoyland
said that he found them. Here is the trial testimony given
by Rife and Hoyland:
Comperet: “Has the Plaintiff ever informed you that
the machines that he designed and built for the Beam Ray
were not operating on the same frequencies as your own?”
Rife: “They were supposed to be operating on the
same…with harmonics.”
Philip Hoyland when he was on the stand was asked:
Comperet: “I understand that you say that the frequencies
used in the machines put out by the corporation were not
set to the same frequencies as Dr. Rife’s machines
[Rife Ray #4].”
Hoyland: “That is correct.”
Comperet: “Then it was during the period between
September and November that you told Edwards at his home
that the machines you were building were not putting out
the same frequencies as Dr. Rife’s machines?”
Hoyland: “Yes.”
Comperet: “How did you explain that?”
Hoyland: “In the summer of 1936 I designed a new
machine, or rather I checked it there at the lab [The Beam
Ray instrument that used audio frequencies]. I had designed
it in Pasadena, and we tested it out then and the frequencies
were not the same as on Dr. Rife’s machine.”
Comperet: “Did you tell him how great the difference
it was?”
Hoyland: “I explained that there was quite a fundamental
difference.”
When Edwards was on the stand he said this:
Comperet: “Did Mr. Hoyland tell you at any time in
the fall of last year that the machines he was manufacturing
for Beam Ray corporation operated on a principle fundamentally
different from Dr. Rife’s machine?”
Edwards: “Mr. Hoyland told me at one time that Dr.
Rife thought that he had the frequencies but he didn’t
have them.” (Beam Ray trial papers www.rife.org)
There are some good reasons why Hoyland built the instruments
the way he did. Rife and Hoyland became partners in Beam
Ray Corporation in 1937. Rife had 45% ownership and Hoyland
had 55%. Hoyland was worried about keeping the frequencies
secret because he felt that people would steal their invention
(This concern of Hoyland’s was not unfounded because
Parsons of the British Group did try to steal their invention).
From the trial we learn they had no way to patent the instrument
because everything they were doing was in public domain.
Hoyland felt that he had to come up with a way to keep anyone
from finding out what the true frequencies were. So he built
the instruments using audio frequencies. But he also built
those instruments using gating and a harmonic carrier frequency.
It was the interaction of the sine wave audio frequencies
and the harmonic carrier frequency along with the gating
that made them work (more about this later). Benjamin Cullen
said Philip Hoyland spent allot of time at the lab. In Cullen’s
taped interview he said this:
Cullen: “Philip Hoyland was in there quite a lot...Hoyland
developed some few items in the lab...Hoyland seemed to
help quite a lot and he got into the bacteriology side with
Rife a good deal because Rife had so much to work out...he
finally got to the point where he [Rife] had to delegate
some of the work.” (John Marsh Rife CDs, CD 6 track
1)
From the trial we learn Hoyland developed and tested his
instrument in the lab. How could Hoyland have tested it
unless he put micro-organisms under the microscope? From
both Cullen and Hoyland’s testimony it is clear Hoyland
designed and built these instruments and found the audio
frequencies that were used in them. From the trial papers
we learn that Hoyland didn’t tell Rife what frequencies
he was using in the instruments. Rife thought that the instruments
were using his frequencies (the frequencies used in the
Rife Ray #4) but with harmonics. Hoyland built these instruments
using audio frequencies, harmonics and gating. Hoyland told
many of the other owners of the corporation that the instruments
were not using Rife’s frequencies. Dr. Rife eventually
found out about this and was very unhappy that the instruments
were not working on his frequencies and principles. He Stated
this:
Rife: “I spoke only Friday evening to a Mr. John
Chamblin, a radio man now connected with Beam Rays inc.,
about the redesign and building of a device according to
the old Rife Ray principles; as the present instrument has
been so deviated away from that old principle that it is
nowhere near the same...those devices which you have are
merely working on a harmonic and not a true frequency; and
in our research on electronics, we definitely know that
there is no possible way of controlling electrical harmonics
of a frequency.” (Rife to Gonin letter May 14, 1939)
From the Beam Ray trial we have now learned where the audio
frequencies came from. These audio frequency instruments
that Hoyland built seemed to work very well. In fact the
doctors that used them reported astounding results on the
patients they used them on. But the fact still remains these
audio frequencies that were used in these instruments were
not Rife’s, nor discovered by him. There has been
a lot of controversy about whether Rife used audio frequencies
in his early instruments. The fact is he did. While looking
through his microscope he found two audio frequencies for
killing micro-organisms. These two audio frequencies were
listed on his lab notes. But it was Hoyland and not Rife
who found the other audio frequencies used in the 1930’s
Beam Ray instruments. Hoyland’s frequencies were lowered
by a factor of 10 and used in the 1950’s AZ-58 ray
tube audio instruments and the pad instruments. We will
discuss the lowering of the frequencies later when we look
at the 1950s instruments. These audio frequencies have been
attributed to Dr. Rife and this is what has caused all the
confusion over the past 30 or 40 years. They have also been
attributed to John Crane. Now for the final proof. Below
are the audio frequencies that were found by Philip Hoyland
and used in the 1930’s Beam Ray Corporation instruments.
The credit for re-discovering these frequencies, which were
taken from an original Beam Ray instrument, should be given
to Aubrey Scoon and the British Rife Group. Information
about the instrument and its frequencies can be found at
http://www.scoon.co.uk/Electrotherapy/Rife/BeamRay.
| Philip Hoyland’s Beam Ray audio frequencies |
| BX (carcinoma) |
21275 |
Typhoid Virus |
18620 |
| BY (sarcoma) |
20080 |
Tetanus |
1200 |
| Treponema |
6600 |
Typhoid Fever (rod form) |
6900 |
| Staphylococcus |
7270 |
Pneumonia |
7660 |
| Streptothrix |
7870 |
B. Coli (rod form) |
8020 |
Tuberculosis (rod form) |
8300 |
Streptococcus |
8450 |
| Tuberculosis Virus |
16000 |
Worms |
2400 |
B. Coli (filterable virus) |
17220 |
|
|
On the John Marsh collection of Rife audio CDs Dr. Couche
makes some interesting comments. He was present at the 1934
clinic sponsored by Dr. Johnson and the University of Southern
California where 16 terminally ill patients who had cancer
and tuberculosis were treated. Dr. Couche said this about
the frequencies used on the patients:
Dr. Couche: “They gave him a treatment of the Rife
frequencies which are in the auditory band.”
(John Marsh Rife CDs - CD 3 track 1)
This interview took place 20 years after the 1934 clinic
ended. We now know that audio frequencies were not used
in the 1934 clinic but were discovered in late 1936 by Hoyland.
It is apparent that Dr. Couche was getting the Beam Ray
Hoyland instruments mixed up with the earlier high frequency
instruments built in 1936. Couche bought an instrument in
early 1936. He also bought 3 instruments that used audio
frequencies from Beam Ray Corporation, so it would be easy
to get things mixed up. The instrument bought in 1936 would
have been patterned after the Rife Ray #4 instrument. Twelve
of these instruments were built in 1936. These instruments
had no band or switch settings on them. The #4 instrument
had switch settings numbering from 1 to 10 covering a frequency
range from 87,000 hertz to 22.5 MHz (Megahertz). It could
output 2 frequencies at the same time. These 12 instruments
most likely covered a frequency range from about 87,000
hertz to 2 MHz and also output 2 frequencies at the same
time. In this range (100,000 hertz to 2MHz) they would not
need any band or switch settings. The original #4 was a
clinical instrument and that is why it had such a high frequency
range. The 12 that were built in 1936 and used by doctors
would not have needed to operate any higher than about 2
MHz because the highest frequency used on a microorganism
was 1,604,000 cycles. What the carrier frequency was is
not known but it would have been at least 3 or 4 MHz.
 |
|
|
The instrument in the photo on top was Dr. Couche’s
instrument that he bought in 1936. You can see the two frequency
dials that made it so that they could run two frequencies
at the same time. This was a unique characteristic of the
instruments patterned after the #4. This instrument of Dr.
Couche’s was purchased by Dr. Tully in 1952. On the
John Marsh Rife CDs, Dr. Rife and Dr. Tully talk about the
double bubble tube and how it was all dark inside. Dr. Rife
told Dr. Tully that this tube was the best ray tube he ever
had. Rife said he used this ray tube for over sixteen years.
If you look closely at the photo on the left you will see
how dark the ray tube was.
The photo on the bottom is of the 1939 Beam Ray Corporation
instrument. This instrument used Hoyland’s audio frequencies.
It only output 1 audio frequency at a time and this is why
it only has one big frequency knob in between the two smaller
knobs. The smaller knobs change the amplitude and the frequency
band settings. The 1950’s ray tube instruments were
patterned after these instruments but with some changes.
1950’s Life Labs ray tube instrument
1) Used a ray tube.
2) Could change between 2.2 and 4.8 MHz sine wave carrier
frequency.
3) Modulated square wave audio frequencies onto a
sine wave
carrier frequency.
4) Power usage about 460 watts. Output to the
ray tube about
60 RF watts.
Some of the following information comes from the John Marsh
collection of Rife audio CDs. In 1950 John Crane met Dr.
Rife and in 1952-53 he met John Marsh. Marsh became John
Crane’s supervisor at Convair Aeronautics when Marsh
moved from Tucson, Arizona to California. Marsh’s
wife had cancer and they were not able to help her in Tucson
so the doctors recommended that he take her to San Diego
for specialized care. Marsh and Crane became friends. Crane
told Marsh about Dr. Rife and so they went to see him. Dr.
Rife gave them an old Beam Ray instrument which they had
Vern Thompson repair. They used this instrument on Marsh’s
wife and after several treatments Marsh said that she fully
recovered. Here are John Marsh’s statements made in
1976 and 1986:
Marsh: (1976) “I met this Rife. I said Dr. Rife,
I said, my name is John Marsh, I’ve got a wife that’s
dying. She’s got cancer of the uterus.” Rife
said: “I won’t touch that thing with a 20 yard
pole.”
After some discussion Rife said:
Rife: “I have an old instrument down here in the basement.”
Marsh: “I dug up that old instrument and of course
it had tubes in it, antique stuff, and so I rebuilt the
darn thing.” (John Marsh Rife CDs, CD 10 track 1)
Marsh: (1986) “I went to see him [Dr. Rife], and
I talked with him and he said he didn’t want to have
any part of it...I said look, I got a wife that’s
dying and I need your help! And so I got him out of his
cocoon, so to speak, and we took an old instrument and rebuilt
it. And I treated my wife and by darn all the pain left
her and she got well.” In another part of the tape
he said: “I discovered that this Dr. Rife was a very
great individual...I told John [Crane], I said look if we
have any of those old instruments laying around loose, let’s
rejuvenate one of them and see if we can get my wife well.
Well Vern Thompson who was with the San Diego police department
radios, uh, radio expert, uh, had built some instruments
and they were antiques when I saw them.” (John Marsh Rife CDs,
CD 2 track 3)
Marsh and Crane then decided they would like to work with
Dr. Rife and try and get the frequency instruments built
and back into doctor’s hands to help people who were
suffering from many incurable diseases. From earlier quotes
we learned that Vern Thompson had in the 1930’s worked
on Dr. Yale’s Beam Ray Corporation instruments. He
knew these instruments inside and out and this is why Marsh
and Crane had him repair the instrument that Dr. Rife gave
them. Vern Thompson also knew the frequencies these Hoyland
instruments used. From Rife’s deposition we learn
that he and Vern Thompson gave Crane the frequencies in
1950. Dr. Rife did not approve of Hoyland’s instrument
so he would have given him the Rife Ray #4 frequencies and
possibly the lab note frequencies. On the John Marsh Rife CDs
Henry Siner reads from a lab note that was for the BX
cancer virus. The frequency that he read was 1,604,000 cycles
per second for the BX and this also confirms the frequency
used in the #4 instrument. So it is clear that Dr. Rife
had given him his frequencies, not Hoyland’s. Crane
eventually received almost all of Rife’s information
and equipment.
For some unknown reason Rife, Crane and Marsh started building
instruments that used audio frequencies. It may have been
that they were the easiest to build because they already
had a working Beam Ray instrument, or maybe it was because
they had worked so well for the doctors in the 1930’s.
Hoyland’s instrument had achieved incredible results.
The underlying technology was still Dr. Rife’s. He
had discovered this technology and Hoyland had built an
instrument that used harmonics to get to Dr. Rife’s
fundamental frequencies that he had used in the Rife Ray
#4 instrument. Because of the results of these doctors,
Dr. Rife must have relented enough to at least give them
a thorough test. It really doesn’t matter. Whatever
the reason was they built audio frequency instruments. For
some reason they also changed Hoyland’s instrument
to make their own. Hoyland had used a harmonic carrier frequency.
Rife did not like the harmonics and had openly expressed
in letters his dislike for them. John Crane said that the
first instrument they built didn’t work and it took
a few years to get it to work. Let’s take a logical
look at the changes they made. When they changed the harmonic
carrier frequency in the instrument to a non-harmonic carrier
frequency and took out the gating the sine wave audio frequencies
wouldn’t work anymore. The audio frequencies are not
true M.O.R.s (M.O.R. Stands for mortal oscillatory rate.
Dr. Rife said this is the frequency that kills the organism).
We know that the Rife Ray #4 frequencies were the true M.O.R.s.
Hoyland’s instrument needed a harmonic carrier frequency
to work. All the audio frequencies used in Hoyland’s
instrument were to interact with the harmonic carrier and
gating to produce the true M.O.R.s. It most likely took
them a little while to figure out why the instrument didn’t
work. This explains why it took a few years to get the instrument
they were building to work. The only way to get the harmonics
back without changing the carrier frequency back to a harmonic
carrier was to put harmonics into the audio frequencies.
A square wave audio frequency would do this and this why
they changed from sine wave to square wave.
The next thing that was changed was the frequencies. Rife,
Crane and Marsh lowered Hoylands frequencies by a factor
of 10. Marsh said they came up with the frequencies using
mathematics. Surely they had the frequencies of Hoyland’s
instrument. Vern Thompson knew what frequencies Hoyland’s
instrument used and would have given those audio frequencies
to Rife, Crane and Marsh. Once you change the frequencies
from sine to square wave you can lower them because of the
harmonics the square wave frequencies produce. So it is
logical to assume that they just lowered Hoyland’s
frequencies and used them in the AZ-58. There are only a
few variations in the frequencies and these adjustments
may have been necessary in order to get them to work. Most
people have felt that the lower audio frequencies were John
Crane’s invention. The facts have shown that they
were Hoyland’s lowered by 10 times. Others have felt
that Crane took advantage of Dr. Rife and did his own thing.
This may be true in some things that took place later on
in the 1970’s and 80’s but the evidence does
not support this in the 1950’s and early 1960’s.
Here is a quote from the Marsh Ohio and Gonin papers that
are on www.rife.org under the John Marsh paperwork. Dr.
Rife, Marsh and Crane were talking at great length about
his trip to Ohio to see Dr. Stafford. In the Gonin papers
they talked about the frequencies. I would recommend that
everyone read these papers because they show that Rife,
Crane and Marsh worked as a team and that Marsh and Crane
considered the AZ-58 instrument to be Rife’s instrument.
If
you are finding this article interesting you'll like
what we did with this Function Generator. Click Here
for more Info.
Rife: “Well I have lived my life for the benefit
of humanity, and it is the end result of the accomplishment.”
Marsh: “Yes, now here is what I did tell them. They
wondered where I fit into the picture. I told them I had
lay outs at the base, I designed part of it. You would say
that I was possibly not an exactly an inventor, but I think
we are all co-inventors of a sort by adding what we think
would make the instrument better and if they try to validified
(verify) any of the statements that I have said to them
please don’t let me down, and say no this isn’t
so, which might upset what might be the truth to them. I
mean just by accident. Now what I mean by that is this.
I don’t think that I have in my own right lied to
them. I did [didn’t] try to impress them with the
idea that I was the one that did it. I did impress that
you [Rife], John Crane and myself had worked together on
this thing, but that you [Rife] were inventor and John [Crane]
was the designer and inventor, co-inventor and myself for
putting this thing together and making it. They asked if
I helped putting this thing together and making it from
time to time. I couldn’t tell them that I didn’t,
because if I had built up a feeling in them that I knew
nothing about what I was doing; psychologically that could
have torn down, or have caused delay the foundation that
now is laid. Now I think we have a solid footing there.
I under no circumstances would want that torn down, and
I will not under any circumstances accept the credit for
this instrument as being invented, because it is Rife’s
instrument as printed on the plate in front and that is
one of the reasons in building you up to them, which I don’t
think is unwarranted; not by a darn sight, and that is why
they want you there. They want to hear you talk, and they
also want to know your past experiences with the people
of La Jolla and also I was very happy to have received the
paper concerning the Dr. etc., because I’m sure Stafford
will contact every blooming Dr. that you had given him to
me and I turned over all the letters to him, because I didn’t
want anything to stand in the way if he could contact him,
now whether he would do that, before he would talk to the
group, and I do not know. I suppose he will, but he wants
the truth as badly as you do. Now I don't know an easier
way it can be done. I don't think there is going to be an
easy way to get it on, but I think I’ve outlined this
thing. I studied the moves I was going to make before I
ever went there. I studied what I was going to do if I had
the opportunity to do so, which I did.”
Rife: “Well I think that you did a very excellent
job.” (John Marsh collection - Trip to Ohio papers
pages 4 & 5. www.rife.org)
And in the Marsh Gonin papers we read:
Crane: “So the frequencies [audio] we have written
down. I will give you those or Rife will give them to you.
I think you ought to have them. Each one [organism] has
a different frequency, you see. I don’t remember any
of them off-hand. I should memorize them all, but I haven’t
yet. I’ve just written them down and they are in the
lab.”
GONIN: “Those frequencies that you have written down,
would only apply to your own machine [AZ-58], wouldn’t
it?”
Crane: “That is because they have been calibrated
for each machine. Each machine has its own calibration.”
GONIN: “And that’s constant?”
Crane: “Yes.” (John Marsh collection - Gonin
and Siner papers page 15. www.rife.org)
When you read these documents the facts stand out that
all three of them knew the frequencies and they were not
Crane’s invention. Marsh and Crane considered the
instrument to be Dr. Rife’s. Rife also had a plaque
on the front of the instrument with his name on it. It is
also clear from Marsh’s papers that Dr. Rife was not
on the sidelines but was a full partner in Life Labs. He
fully knew how the instrument worked and was as hopeful
as both Crane and Marsh that it would work using audio frequencies.
But when Rife was asked about the frequencies in about 1957
he said that they were from the audio band to the broadcast
band of frequencies. This tells us that he was still reserving
his final decision about the audio frequencies until after
the instrument was fully tested. Dr. Rife said he never
fooled himself and I don’t believe that he did on
this AZ-58 instrument.
Anyone who reads the documents from this time can tell that
there were a lot of high hopes for this instrument. Now
the real question is how well did it work. There were a
lot of good reports on how well the instrument worked but
what really counts is how well it worked in the hands of
the doctors that used it on their patients. Dr. Stafford
used the AZ-58 for 5 years on his patients. His report is
on www.rife.org with the John Marsh documents. His report
is very favorable on many conditions that he used it for
but when it came to cancer this instrument did not work
as well as Hoyland’s instrument. Dr. Stafford said
this about the AZ-58 audio frequency instrument:
Dr. Stafford: “As yet, we have failed to “cure”
any case of advanced, terminal malignancy. It appears in
several instances that we may have impressed the disease
favorably, temporarily. It is difficult to rule out the
psychological, morale booster effect to the terminal patient
when some definitive effort is made again in his behalf.
However, several improvements have appeared to be more physical
than emotional...All the patients in the series were treated
with the same frequencies (e.g., 728 - 784 - 880 - 2008
- 2128). Perhaps these frequencies may be wrong, or only
nearly correct.” (John Marsh collection - Dr. Stafford’s
report on using the AZ-58. www.rife.org)
Everyone that has been around Rife technology for a long
time has seen the very same results as Dr. Stafford. The
question is why did Philip Hoyland’s audio instrument
work so much better than the AZ-58 when it came to cancer?
It appears they should have built the AZ-58 exactly the
same as Hoyland’s machine and not taken the gating
and harmonics out of the carrier frequency. The combination
of the sine wave audio frequencies with the harmonic carrier
frequency plus the gating in his instrument made it work.
Hoyland was trying to keep the true frequencies secret.
If someone just read the audio frequencies and thought they
had the true M.O.R. frequencies they would be mistaken.
The instrument had to be built exactly the way Hoyland built
it to work. This unique way of building the instrument accomplished
what he wanted to do and that was to keep anyone from finding
out what the true M.O.R.s. were. As we have already read
Dr. Stafford came to suspect that the audio frequencies
were not true M.O.R.s and wrote a letter to Dr. Edward Jeppson
in Salt Lake City because Dr. Jeppson was having the same
type of results Dr. Stafford was having. Here is his statement
from his letter:
Dr. Stafford: “Please excuse my format in the following
letter for I intend to ramble a bit and forget strict grammatical
dictum. I am writing you at this time partially because
John Marsh informs me in a recent letter that you may be
somewhat disheartened or at least worried about your role
in the experimentations with the Rife Machine. Believe me,
Dr. Edward I know how you feel for I too have been through
this same feeling with this matter. I have observed clinical
results after treatments with this gadget which I can scarcely
believe myself. Yet, despite these good results, I have
been confused by some rather simple failures such as a recent
experiment which I conducted at Good Samaritan Hospital
where we used the machine to treat some cultures of Staph
Aureus and Strept. Fecalis. In this work we failed to inhibit
growth at all or influence the cultures with the Rife Rx.
I sent the results to John Marsh and asked for clarification
and to be very frank I am not satisfied with John’s
excuse of the failure as described by Dr. Rife. I am afraid
I’m not a very good apostle for I’m getting
some ideas myself on how this thing may work. I really wonder
if this ultrasonic kill’s bacteria and virus at all
or does it work like other forms of ultrasonic and merely
stimulate the tissue in some unusual manner thereby improving
the circulation and secondarily enhancing the bodies defenses
against infection…To summarize some of this rambling:
I feel that the Rife Ultrasonic Therapy has a very definitely
beneficial effect on the human (and canine) body...I furthermore
feel that we, as doctors of medicine, using this machine
must remain constantly alert to the condition of our patient
and vary the Rx as indicated...Let me hear from you Dr.
Jeppson. How are your cases coming along.”
Clearly Dr. Stafford didn’t believe that the audio
frequencies were correct. Little did he know they weren’t
even close to the true frequencies. The Rife Ray #4 frequencies
were the correct ones and the AZ-58 could not output these
frequencies. Whatever was told to Dr. Stafford by Dr. Rife
through John Marsh there was no way that they were going
to tell Dr. Stafford he wasn’t using the correct frequencies.
This would ruin everything that they had worked for. Besides
they were testing the AZ-58 to see how well it would work
using audio frequencies. At this time it is apparent the
AZ-58 was not performing as well as Hoyland’s instrument.
We need to remember Hoyland tested his instrument using
Dr. Rife’s microscope. When Henry Siner was in England
testing Hoyland’s instrument he reported that it would
kill the organisms while they were looking at them under
Rife’s microscope. Dr. Stafford found out the AZ-58
was not capable of doing this. In the 1950’s Rife
no longer had a lab for testing any microorganisms. They
were not able to test the AZ-58 frequencies properly with
the microscope. So they did the only thing they could. They
let the doctors use it and tell them how well it worked.
We must remember the first instrument that Rife gave to
Marsh and Crane was Hoyland’s and it worked. It cured
Marsh’s wife of cancer. Again the fact is the AZ-58
never worked as well as Hoyland’s instrument. How
Hoyland came up with his idea to built his instrument and
make it work is still not fully understood. The changes
made to Hoyland’s instrument to produce the AZ-58
were not good changes. These changes did not produce the
same results as Hoyland’s instrument. But still even
with the changes the AZ-58 worked very well on just about
everything else but cancer. These lower square wave audio
frequencies are what people have been using for the past
50 years believing they were Rife’s true M.O.R.s.
Until the Beam Ray trial papers, John Marsh papers and the
Beam Ray instrument of Hoyland’s came to light we
did not have the ability to finally figure out where all
these frequencies came from. And which frequencies were
the true M.O.R.s. Not withstanding the various setbacks
Dr. Stafford was still amazed at the wonderful results he
achieved with the AZ-58. Below are the frequencies that
were used in the AZ-58 by Dr. Stafford:
| 1950’s Life Labs ray tube instrument frequencies |
| BX (carcinoma) |
2128 |
Typhoid Virus |
1862 |
| BY (sarcoma) |
2008 |
Tetanus |
120 |
| Treponema |
660 |
Typhoid Fever (rod form) |
712 |
| Staphylococcus |
727 |
Pneumonia |
776 |
| Streptothrix |
784 |
B. Coli (rod form) |
800 |
Tuberculosis (rod form) |
803 |
Streptococcus |
880 |
| Tuberculosis Virus |
1552 |
Gonorrhea |
712 |
B. Coli (filterable virus) |
1552 |
|
|
What are harmonics and how do they work?
We have talked a lot about harmonics of frequencies but
have not explained what they are and how they work. All
frequencies produce harmonics. Depending on the wave form
they can produce a few harmonics or a lot of harmonics.
Any frequency, when using a square wave, can produce infinite
harmonics if you have infinite power. Of course this is
impossible. Some instruments may have 1 watt and others
50 or 100 watts of power. So the limit of the harmonics
is based on the power that you have. A simple way to understand
harmonics is to think of a pebble thrown into a pool of
water. Think of the pebble as the frequency and the ripples
as harmonics. Each ripple gets weaker the further away it
gets from where the pebble was thrown into the pool. So
harmonics of frequencies also get weaker as they go further
up or down from the main frequency. Square wave frequencies
have the greatest harmonics and this is most likely why
they were used in the 1950’s instruments.
Dr. Rife’s true M.O.R. or frequency for cancer was
1,604,000 cycles per second or 1.604 megahertz. Dr. Rife
said on the John Marsh CDs that harmonics are in 4ths, 8ths,
16ths, 32nds, 64ths and so on. Notice that the harmonics
go in even numbers. If you have a frequency of 2 hertz (2
cycles per second) your first harmonic is 4 hertz and the
next one after that is 8 hertz, then 16 hertz. The harmonics
will keep going up in this manner infinitely as long as
you have the power to drive the harmonics. Hoyland built
his instrument to work on harmonics so that no one would
know the true frequencies. So the audio frequencies were
not true M.O.R.s.
In all cases these audio frequencies were not even true
harmonics of Rife’s true M.O.R.s. Hoyland designed
his instrument to work in such a way that it was the interaction
of the sine wave frequencies with the harmonic carrier and
the gating that produced true harmonic frequencies. He must
have used some mathematical computations in order to build
his instrument. But no one knows what those computations
were.
Now we come to the 1950’s instruments. These audio
frequencies used in the AZ-58 were not true M.O.R. frequencies
either. They did not even produce true harmonics because
they were Hoyland’s frequencies lowered. The AZ-58
was not built like Hoyland’s instrument and had no
capability to produce the true harmonics of the Rife Ray
#4 frequencies. Why then do these audio frequencies which
are not even true harmonics work on so many different ailments?
Maybe it is because of the ripples in the pool that we described
earlier. This is the only possible way these audio frequencies
could work as well as they did on everything but cancer.
To get the harmonics of a frequency all you have to do is
divide the frequency by 2 over and over until you get to
the audio range of frequencies. The true M.O.R. frequency
for cancer was 1,604,000 hertz and the true audio frequency
harmonic is 1566.4 not 2128. The other frequency used for
cancer in the AZ-58 was 2008 and it’s also not a true
harmonic of 1,604,000 hertz. As you can see the frequencies
are off as Dr. Stafford suspected. Another problem was the
accuracy of the instruments built back in the 1950’s.
Dr. Stafford had to regularly calibrate them to keep them
on frequency and mentioned this problem to Rife, Crane and
Marsh.
As mentioned you can only drive harmonics of a lower frequency
to a higher frequency as long as you have enough power.
When you take the frequency of 1566.4 hertz and try and
drive the harmonics of that frequency to 1,604,000 hertz
or cycles per second it is all but impossible to do. One
million six hundred and four thousand cycles per second
is the 10th harmonic of 1566.4. In reality this is the 10th
ripple in the pool of water and this is why it is almost
impossible to get this frequency to work on cancer. Power
is the problem with the 10th harmonic. Every harmonic only
has about half the power of the one it came from. For a
very simple illustration, if we had an instrument that output
50 watts of power we would divide 50 by 2. This would give
us the power of the first harmonic which is 25 watts. The
second only has 12.5 watts. The third only has 6.25 watts.
By the 10th harmonic you only have .09 watts of power. If
you had an instrument that output 300 watts (which is far
more power than what Dr. Rife considered safe) it would
only be .29 watts of power at the 10th harmonic. This is
a very simple description, but it shows what we are up against
when we use harmonic audio frequencies rather than the fundamental
frequencies or M.O.R.S. Anyone can understand if you use
the true M.O.R.s. you’re going to be far better off
and have a better chance of success.
Life Labs1950’s pad instrument (without ray tube)
1) Used round disks that came in contact with the body.
Later changed in the 1960’s to hand cylinders or foot
pads.
2) Had no RF carrier frequency.
3) Used the square wave audio frequencies used in the AZ-58.
It was about 1957 when, John Crane and John Marsh began
building instruments without a ray tube. Earlier in this
article Comperet was quoted as saying:
Comperet: “Now, Crane said 'Well now look,
Rife himself admits that no matter how much tube and ray,
and so on, you have, you can’t get any results unless
you’ve got the right frequency. Therefore the real
clue to the thing is the frequency and not the means by
which you deliver it.' ” (Comperet interview papers
- 1970’s)
Crane and Marsh replaced the ray tube with a type of pad
that they developed which came in contact with the body.
From the documented information we have it was the high
cost of building ray tube instruments that caused them to
look at doing things a different way. In addition to being
expensive to build, the ray tube could break very easily.
They had many problems with them. I don’t believe
Rife ever had a reason to look at doing things differently.
Crane and Marsh did! They didn’t have the kind of
money to spend that Rife did. Necessity is the mother of
invention!
Crane and Marsh used a Heathkit function generator to produce
the frequencies. These Heathkit function generators had
no built in carrier frequency on which to modulate the audio
frequencies. Therefore, the carrier frequency was no longer
used. Though Crane and Marsh achieved great results with
these instruments, they did not use a carrier frequency.
What would have been the results if they had used these
audio frequencies with a carrier frequency? From what we
have previously discussed in this article, the carrier
frequency was very important. Rife would never have approved of using
an instrument without a carrier. The positive part of using
a Heathkit function generator in this way was that they
were inexpensive ($200) and a lot more people could afford
one. For this we owe John Crane and John Marsh a great measure
of gratitude. Crane and Marsh proved that the frequencies
worked the same whether applied through a ray tube or pads.
Many people think that Crane and Marsh built the pad instrument
without Dr. Rife being fully informed about it. This was
not the case. In John Marsh’s trip to Ohio papers
we read this:
Rife: “That is the only way that it can be handled
properly.”
Marsh: “Maybe we can sell small instruments for the
purpose of small diseases like colds, flu and stuff like
that, which are minor, which the Dr.s prefer not treating
those kind anyway, because they are chronic, and there isn’t
anything they can do with them. People keep coming in and
coming in and they take up his time where he could spend
it taking care of a bad case, or something or other. Dr.
Stafford said that he would prefer that a small instrument
would be made...What do you think John? I've been doing
a lot of talking not even giving you a chance to get a word
in edgewise.”
Crane: “There is no doubt there is going to be an
awful lot of development on this design…” John
Marsh collection - Trip to Ohio papers page 10. www.rife.org)
From these statements we learn that Dr. Rife knew that they
wanted to build small instruments. Also we learn that it
was Marsh and Crane’s idea to build the pad instruments
and not Rife’s. We know that Rife was upset with Crane
over some of his changes because he expressed it to Comperet
during his 1961 deposition. Comperet said:
Comperet: “And I asked Rife, because I thought Rife
would certainly say that the way Crane was working on it
then was still using the Rife principle, but he indignantly
denied it.” (Comperet interview papers - 1970’s)
At this time Crane and Marsh were working on both the ray
tube instrument and the pad instrument. We know that Dr.
Rife considered the ray tube instrument his, so it must
have been the pad instruments without a carrier frequency
that he was upset with. Let’s face the facts. Dr.
Rife didn’t like Hoyland’s audio instrument
at first. But with Crane and Marsh he built the AZ-58 to
see how well it would work and put his name on it. Crane
and Marsh built the pad instrument and Rife didn’t
like it. Now after some 40 years of use and the wonderful
results that people have been getting with this type of
instrument, maybe Dr. Rife, if he were alive today, would
approve of it. Marsh and Crane’s innovation with a
pad instrument did prove that the ray tube could be removed
and still produce the same results as long as you have sufficient
power. This made it possible for more people to have access
to Rife’s technology. Today all the frequencies which
Rife found to kill microorganisms can be produced by any
function generator with the proper frequency range.
Crane and Marsh made one mistake with these pad instruments.
Because the Heathkit function generator that they used didn’t
have a Megahertz (MHz) carrier frequency they didn’t
use one. Rife and Hoyland’s instruments used some
kind of carrier frequency. Audio frequencies will not broadcast;
therefore, they are modulated upon the carrier frequency
so that they will penetrate the body where they can devitalize
microorganisms. In laymen’s terms, modulation is piggy-backing
one or more low frequencies on another higher frequency.
The frequencies travel together but still remain separate
and distinct. Many instruments built today do not use a
carrier frequency even though Dr. Rife’s did. If Rife
could have removed the carrier frequencies from his instrument
and gotten the same results, I believe he would have. As
it is, Dr. Rife never removed the carrier
frequency from
any of his instruments. If a person wants to try and get
the results that Rife had then a carrier frequency should
be used.
We realize that there are ray tube
instruments today that do not use a carrier frequency. These use a High Electromagnetic
field which will transfer the energy into the body. They
appear to work very well. We are not trying to upset these
manufacturers either. And we do not doubt that these instruments
work. We know people that are using these instrument and
getting incredible results. But what we are talking about
in this article is the way in which Dr. Rife used a carrier
frequency.
Some people say that audio frequencies in a pad instrument
without a carrier will only travel along the skin of the
body and won’t penetrate it. In scientific studies
on Bioelectric Impedance Analysis in the body it has been
shown that audio frequencies will enter the body but will
only travel in the connective tissues around the cells.
Also in these scientific studies it has been shown that
the closer you get to 1 megahertz the greater the penetration
into the cell. At 1 megahertz the frequency will go straight
through the cell and fully penetrate the body. This
is why it is so important that a carrier frequency be used. A virus
can enter a cell. Audio frequencies without the carrier
will only work in the connective tissues but with a carrier
frequency the audio frequencies can enter the cell where
the virus is located. These kind of scientific studies and
their importance were not understood by John Crane and John
Marsh in the 1950’s and 1960’s. Rife’s
instruments always used a carrier frequency.
Summary:
In summary, with all the historical information that has
now come out in the past few years we finally know the truth
about which frequencies were Rife’s true M.O.R.s.
and where the audio frequencies came from. It was the release
of the John Marsh information from Marsh’s nurse to
AAA Production; the Beam Ray trial papers from the Rife
Research Group of Canada; and the purchase and analyzing
of the Beam Ray instrument by Aubrey Scoon and the British
Rife group that made this possible. Up until now it has
been impossible to figure out where the audio frequencies
came from and which frequencies were used in the 1934 clinic.
We hope that this information will be helpful. As more information
comes out we will update this article as necessary.
Check
out our Function Generator. If you found this article
interesting you'll like what we did with the Function
Generator. Click Here for more Info.
Simply Fill Out This
Form To Learn More About Rife Technology and Related Health
Topics - It's Free:
Why Should I Sign Up? You'll Get Exclusive Reports Not
Available On Our Website and Learn about our member's only
specials. We routinely give out free eBooks on topics related
to Rife. Immediately you'll get this report compiled in
a format that you can read whenever you want without an
internet connection.
Important! Please Read: To eliminate fraud we have implemented
a double opt-in process. You will get an immediate confirmation
email after submitting below. To assure that you receive
the free Rife eBook you must click the "confirmation" link
on this email. After you do this we will send you another
email with the eBook download.
(Would You Also Like To Get Our Printed Catalog?
Click
Here and We'll Send You One!)
for information on instruments email
or call us at +1-541-434-0318 or 1-866-747-7447 (toll
free in US).
© Copyright 1997-2004 www.futuretechtoday.com
- All Rights Reserved
++1-541-434-0318 tele - 1-866-747-7447 toll free in US
Disclaimer: These
statements have not been evaluated by the FDA. Products not intended
to prevent, cure, diagnose, or treat any disease. |